Popular Tags: Katie Ledecky | Jack Conger | Janet Hu | Andrew Seliskar
Quick Links: Schedules/Results | Top Times | Facebook | Twitter | Submit Results | Contact

USA Swimming Enacts Technical Suit Ban Oct. 1

By Amy Shipley
As of Oct. 1, the suit Natalie Coughlin wore in the '04 Olympics is out in USA Swimming competitions. The cut of the others two suits will work, as long as they are textile (Mark Baker, Associated Press)

As of Oct. 1, the suit Natalie Coughlin wore in the '04 Olympics is out in USA Swimming competitions. The cut of the others two suits will work, as long as the suits are textile (Mark Baker, Associated Press)

USA Swimming’s House of Delegates voted overwhelmingly Saturday to ban full-body, non-textile  suits Oct. 1, three months before the world swimming governing body (FINA) plans to enact its ban.

The measure was supported by a nearly unanimous voice vote of more than 400 delegates from swim clubs nationwide at the organization’s annual meeting in Chicago.  Only a brief discussion preceded the vote, USA Swimming spokesperson Jamie Olsen said.

The support for the early date demonstrates USA Swimming’s determination to get rid of the technical suits that have been blamed for the deluge of records set at every level of the sport over the last two years. The move also suggests delegates put aside fears that FINA would backpedal in the coming months on its planned ban.

At the FINA Congress in Rome this summer members voted to allow only textile, waist-to-knee suits for men and textile, neck-to-knee suits for women beginning Jan. 1.

“Our folks just wanted to get on with it,” USA Swimming Executive Director Chuck Wielgus said by cell phone from Chicago. “It just reinforces the sentiment expressed in Rome at the FINA Congress. We’re really not trying to send a message to the rest of the world; what our membership is saying is that actions taken by the FINA Congress, they’re totally behind — in fact, they want to start earlier.”

The vote represented good news for Potomac Valley Swimming’s board of directors, who had already voted to ban the suits for local meets Oct. 1 but found out in recent days that the ban might not stand up. PVS officials were told that the USA Swimming decision would have overridden the PVS ban had the delegates decided on the Jan. 1 date of implementation.

“We were getting a lot of grief about going early just because [people said] we would be putting our kids at a disadvantage — that was the only opposition,” PVS board chair Greg York said. “They were not going to allow us to do this” if the Oct. 1 date had not been accepted. “We’d then have to go back and say, ‘Just kidding, it’s Jan. 1.’”

The USA Swimming ban will effect virtually all meets in the United States, including most club meets.

Now that the ban is in place, USA Swimming officials will have to figure out how to apply and enforce it. FINA will not put out a list of allowable suits until close to Jan. 1, so USA Swimming will be trying to regulate a dress code without a specific governing document.

USA Swimming President Jim Wood said Saturday afternoon he would appoint a task force to hammer out some details of implementation. But, Wood acknowledged, “there may not be an awful lot of specifics to it.”

Wood speculated that USA Swimming might urge its meet officials to focus on the shape of the suits rather than the material from which they are made in the early months of the ban. It’s possible, he said, that no evaluations of materials would be undertaken until FINA’s list is published to try to avoid confusion and disputes about what is allowable and what is not.

“The focus will [probably] be on the profile of the suits,” Wood said. “We’ll try to make it as clear as we can … hopefully, within the next week or so, we’ll be more defined.”

The PVS competition season opens in two weeks with the Oct. 4 All-Freestyle Meet at Fairlands Aquatics Center.

“The only problem is officials have to figure out which suits are OK under the new rules,” York said. “We’ll try to make it clear for our officials.”

Other governing bodies are facing the same challenges. The National Federation of State High School Associations banned the suits but does not plan to release a list of allowable suits, so it is calling on coaches, officials and parents to communicate with governing officials and use common sense. The NCAA enacted a similar ban and is attempting to develop a non-scientific list of suits to act as a guideline for members

Earlier this week, Swimming Canada put the ban in place effective Sept. 1.

The ban adopted by USA Swimming and passed in July by FINA ‘s membership reads: “All swimsuits shall be made from textile materials. For men, the swimsuit shall not extend above the navel nor below the knees, and for women, shall not cover the neck, extend past the shoulder, nor extend below the knee.”

Textile fabric, USA Swimming reports, is defined as “material consisting of natural and/or synthetic, individual and non-consolidated yarns used to constitute a fabric by weaving, knitting and/or braiding.”

7 Responses to “USA Swimming Enacts Technical Suit Ban Oct. 1”

  1. Reaper says:

    This policy by FINA and USA Swimming will kill all the progress this sport has made in the past few years in making swimming a main stream sport. RIP

  2. Andrew says:

    this was a bad mood before there is a list of acceptable suits. There will be a lot of arguments about what qualifies and what doesnt. They should have just waited with FINA

  3. Carlos says:

    Ok, if I show up in a LZR jammer, who is going to say its its legal or not. I’m not an expert on fabrics. All I know is that most of this fabric was develop back in 1996 Seoul Olympics.

    All I see is someone coming in with a “Court Injunction”. How can it be enforced without more specific guidelines. I think I’ll wear a LZR Jammer. It’ll be fun to watch the meet officials trying figure out if I’m legal. And who is to say I’m not without test and a list….

  4. Donal says:

    I just spent $26 on my first pair of jammers, a bit more than my usual briefs. I really don’t want to spend $170 on leggings, or $270 on a bodysuit just to be competitive in a race (and I’m guessing they cost more before the ban).

    Also, I’ve been told that after a few races, the tight-fitting suits develop folds and creases that actually slow you down. Can anyone confirm or refute that?

  5. SCAQ Tony says:

    When you take away profit centers from a sport, such as tech suits, the sport is not going to grow.

    Swim suit companies will disappear and sponsorship opportunities for athletes will disappear and soon thereafter interest will follow.

    2010 will be a BAD year for swimming and I suspect swimming will be as relevant to the daily sports page as a swanky game of chess played in a country I cannot even spell.

    If the USMS bans tech suits or restricts them to that of “short johns”, I will not compete till 2008 rules are restored.

    I suspect others feel the same way. This is FINA’s greatest failure.

    Triathlons and open water swims are looking pretty good to me right now.

  6. Andrew says:

    SCAQ Tony, i agree with you. 2009 has been a great year for the sport. new athletes and companies are emerging with big profits, such as B-70 and Jaked. The problem with your case is that the USA swimming governing body voted almost unanimously on the reversal of suits. It will be difficult to reverse all of those votes. I think they should be asking the athletes more than the coaches and officials in the sport. They are the ones that should decide

  7. Travis says:

    all the tech suits are super cheap now. go to swimoutlet!

Leave a Reply




 





Edit